Born in a rural country setting south of Chicago to a litter of seven brothers and sisters, Pepper, a Labrador Retriever was welcomed into a home that was only to be temporary.
Similar to child custody litigation, he was unfortunately used as a tool, while separated from his rightful owner during a contentious divorce. The arduous trial lasted years making National headlines since no such laws existed at the time protecting neither the litigant nor animal.
Despite numerous similar cases heard in other States for pet recognition, shamefully your pet is viewed as a table, lamp, or similar inert "object."
From this, "Peppers Bill" was created for introduction before the Illinois General Assembly while efforts from courageous Illinois Senator Linda Holmes would take precedence making it to the house floor for the 100th Regular Session.
Illinois Senate Bill 1261, aptly titled Ownership For Companion Animal, would have its first reading on February 9th, 2017, pass the Illinois Senate on April 26th, 2017, pass the Illinois House of Representatives on May 30th, 2017, and become law on August 25th, 2017. Almost sweeping votes, one is left to wonder why it had taken so long.
From this law helps to provide for the best interest of the animal. Similar to child custody: who cares for the pet, feeds them, and spends the most time with them.
From this process, a seed had been planted further pursuing unfair animal practices that other States abide by similar laws. Much larger and more important than Peppers trial, exists today a wider calling for Animal Liberation and Welfare.
Founded with an effort to provide a voice for those sentient creatures through policy change, it has always been the utmost ambition of the AHA to provide for the welfare and fair treatment of animals.
Animal Humane Advocacy asserts that animals have inherent rights and deserve to have their best interests considered, independent of their utility to humans. Just as humans do, animals can feel pain and have a fundamental desire to live their lives on their own terms.
Our mission is to cultivate a compassionate society that prioritizes the respect and protection of animals. By ending Speciesism our dedication is to create a safer and more equitable environment for animals by addressing their needs and defending their rights through comprehensive, multidisciplinary approaches.
is a term that denotes the discrimination against or exploitation of certain species by human beings, based on an assumption of human superiority. This ideology, analogous to racism or sexism, posits that humans are inherently more valuable than non-human animals, thereby justifying their use and mistreatment. The term was popularized by philosopher Peter Singer in his 1975 book "Animal Liberation," where he argued that the interests of animals should be given equal consideration to those of humans.
speciesism is rooted in anthropocentric thinking, where human needs, desires, and experiences are deemed paramount. This worldview permits the systematic exploitation of animals for food, clothing, entertainment, experimentation, and other purposes. The assumption of human superiority is often based on characteristics such as intelligence, language, or moral agency—traits that are perceived to be uniquely human. However, this rationale is flawed because it arbitrarily elevates certain traits that favor humans while ignoring the intrinsic value and capacities of other species.
of speciesism are manifold and pervasive. One of the most glaring manifestations is in factory farming, where billions of animals are raised in inhumane conditions, subject to confinement, mutilation, and ultimately slaughter. The prioritization of economic efficiency over animal welfare results in immense suffering and raises significant ethical concerns. Additionally, the environmental impacts of intensive animal agriculture are profound, contributing to deforestation and water pollution.
where speciesism exerts a detrimental impact is in scientific research. Animals used in laboratories often endure painful procedures, confinement, and euthanasia, justified by the belief that human health benefits override animal suffering. This perspective overlooks the ethical implications and the growing body of evidence suggesting that animal models are not always predictive of human outcomes.
also permeates cultural practices and entertainment. Activities such as trophy hunting, circuses, and marine parks exploit animals for human amusement, often inflicting physical and psychological harm. These practices perpetuate the notion that animals exist for human use, reinforcing speciesist attitudes across generations.
speciesism is criticized for its lack of consistent ethical reasoning. If the capacity to suffer is a criterion for moral consideration, as argued by utilitarians like Singer, then non-human animals should be accorded similar moral status as humans. The dismissal of animal suffering as less significant is an arbitrary distinction that mirrors other forms of discrimination based on irrelevant characteristics.
requires a multifaceted approach. Educational initiatives can foster empathy and awareness about the plight of animals and the ethical implications of speciesist practices. Legal reforms are crucial in establishing and enforcing animal rights, ensuring that animals are protected from abuse and exploitation. Advocacy and policy campaigns play a vital role in challenging and changing institutionalized practices that perpetuate speciesism. Partnerships with legal professionals can bolster efforts to secure stronger legal protections for animals, while public awareness campaigns can shift cultural perceptions towards a more inclusive and respectful view of non-human animals.
While man may brandish a larger stick and an assumed higher intellect, should be used for compassion and empathy as their guardian rather than for dominion and or cruelty. AHA Founder ~ Paul Barthel ~
Posted in July 2022 ~ After a long illness, I am sorry to relate that Pepper passed by my side on the night of May 2, 2022. Unyielding and perhaps selfish, I refused euthanasia as an option. Determined, we fought for his survival between countless trips to the veterinarian, use of medications, and constant companionship and encouragement. Because of his severe arthritis, surgery, and eventual cancer that would ultimately take his life, I did what was best providing the hospice he needed when the end seemed imminent.
Looking back, I would not have done it differently, and am eternally grateful for the time he shared his life with me and the impact he made on others. I never doubted our connection, but nothing could have prepared me for how quiet, empty, and colorlessness the house would become without you. My boy and best friend, I hope to see you again where we can once again hike on unchartered trails. I miss you dearly. Soon. Founder, Paul Barthel
Subscribe to our Substack Page for insightful news and animal commentary.
Copyright © 2022 Animal Humane Advocacy - All Rights Reserved.
Animal Humane Advocacy is a registered 501 (c)(3) non-for-profit all donations are tax deductible